https://pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?ComponentNo=000420
What meta-model does your Enterprise use to define the information that connects the Enterprise’s Strategy to the Enterprise’s Structure?
If you don’t, how is it defined so that others can use it and relate other information to it?
If it is not defined, what problems do you think will result?
https://pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?ComponentNo=000420
FREE EA Training at www.PEAF.com/Training
FREE EA Books at www.PEAF.com/Books
#PEAF #PragmaticEA #EntArch #enterprisearchitecture #BizArch #Change #Innovation #BusinessModel #CEO #Strategy #TOGAF #ITgovernance #agileculture #agile #agileleadership #agilemethodology #itstrategy #ceos
In the past, people only saw part of the picture – that Structural information and Strategy information needed to be bridged by execution information.
https://pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?ComponentNo=000420
And so their meta-models were extended to include things
related to the execution of change such as projects, programmes and plans etc.
Some meta-model authors (recognising that a Motivation model, an Execution
model and a Structural model needed to be integrated and connected) started to
merge these three. One good example is the Enterprise Business Motivation Model
(EBMM) by Nick Malik. ...to read more, please Login or Register |
Keypoint |
Adopt this component by... |
In the past, people only saw part of the picture – that Structural information and Strategy information needed to be bridged by execution information.
|
|
Questions to ponder... |
What meta-model does your Enterprise use to define the information that connects the Enterprise’s Strategy to the Enterprise’s Structure? |
If you don’t, how is it defined so that others can use it and relate other information to it? |
If it is not defined, what problems do you think will result? |
