https://pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?ComponentNo=000425
Do you know of any other meta-models which define both Structural and Transformational information in an integrated way?
Are the meta-models you use integrated, if not what problems are likely to result?
How do you integrate Structural and Transformational artefacts?
If you don’t, does it cause problems that your Structural and Transformational artefacts are not related?
https://pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?ComponentNo=000425
FREE EA Training at www.PEAF.com/Training
FREE EA Books at www.PEAF.com/Books
#PEAF #PragmaticEA #EntArch #enterprisearchitecture #BizArch #Change #Innovation #BusinessModel #CEO #Strategy #TOGAF #ITgovernance #agileculture #agile #agileleadership #agilemethodology #itstrategy #ceos
EBMM covers most Structural and Transformational information but only at the top two levels.
https://pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?ComponentNo=000425
The Enterprise Business Motivation Model (EBMM v3.5 - Nick
Malik) is interesting because it attempts to define entities in both the
Structural and Transformational areas, although again it only covers the higher
levels. It was formed from OMG’s BMM by Microsoft’s Internal EA team and is
influenced by the writings of well-known authors like Geary Rummler, Alan
Brache, and Alexander Osterwalder. ...to read more, please Login or Register |
Keypoint |
Adopt this component by... |
EBMM covers most Structural and Transformational information but only at the top two levels.
|
Enterprise Architect: Think in terms of MAGIC and MAGMA, not EBMM.
|
Questions to ponder... |
Do you know of any other meta-models which define both Structural and Transformational information in an integrated way? |
Are the meta-models you use integrated, if not what problems are likely to result? |
How do you integrate Structural and Transformational artefacts? |
If you don’t, does it cause problems that your Structural and Transformational artefacts are not related? |