Index

PF2

Head

POET

Head

Methods

Disciplines

Decision Making

Culture
Making Them
Changing Them
The Red Button
Jumping to Conclusions

Guidance

Guidance

Items

Architecture and Engineering

Yin and Yang
Architect Horizontally Engineer Vertically

Culture

Culture

Slaves to Psychology

What Do You Think
Is All Value Easy to See
I Was Only Doing What I was Told
Are You Better Than a 5 Year Old
Who Decides
Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely
Style over Substance
The Halo Horn Effect
Cognitive Dissonance
The Dunning Kruger Effect
The Peter Principle
The Matthew Effect
Prices Law
The Best Managers Are Sociopaths
Personality Traits
The Prisons of Two Ideas
Logical Fallacies

PEAF

Head

Adoption

Step 4

Risks

Culture

Culture

Organisation Structure

Traditional vs Pragmatic

The Management vs The Workers

Most Valued Player MVP
Comparison

IT vs The Business

Is IT Special

What vs How
Yes But Not Because its IT
When Two Tribes Go To War
Should IT Ever Say No to The Business
Comparison
       
Click a Thumbnail to read the component. Hold down Ctrl while clicking to expand the image

 

- TK-Risks








POET>Culture>Slaves-to-Psychology>The-Dunning-Kruger-Effect ◄◄◄           .           ►►► POET>Culture>Slaves-to-Psychology>The-Matthew-Effect

The Peter Principle (developed by Laurence J Peter and published by William Morrow and Company in 1969) says that people in any hierarchy tend to rise to their “level of incompetence”, because the skills required to make someone good in one job, are not necessarily the skills required for another job. For example, a good engineer would probably be a bad manager, and a good manager would probably be a bad engineer.

 ...to read more, please Login or Register

POET>Culture>Slaves-to-Psychology>The-Dunning-Kruger-Effect ◄◄◄         Enroll to Self Study Now!         ►►► POET>Culture>Slaves-to-Psychology>The-Matthew-Effect

Keypoint

Adopt this component by...

Success should not be promoted.

C-Suite: Mandate that promotions and recruitment should be based on the ability to do the promoted job, not on the success in a previous job.

Questions to ponder...

Do people in your Enterprise promote based on success in a previous role, or the capacity to excel in the new role?

Can you think of examples where this has happened in the past?

Who were they? What was the impact? Why do you think they acted in this way?

What needs to change to reduce the likelihood of it happening in the future?

Who needs to drive that change?





© 2008-2021 Pragmatic 365 Ltd         A Non-Profit dedicated to improving Transformation, and the lives of people that work in Transformation.