https://pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?Showname=BOOKR-PF2&ComponentNo=000277
Do you agree that Zachman gets more IT centric the further down you go?
If not, why not? How would you map these things?
https://pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?Showname=BOOKR-PF2&ComponentNo=000277
FREE EA Training at www.PEAF.com/Training
FREE EA Books at www.PEAF.com/Books
#PEAF #PragmaticEA #EntArch #enterprisearchitecture #BizArch #Change #Innovation #BusinessModel #CEO #Strategy #TOGAF #ITgovernance #agileculture #agile #agileleadership #agilemethodology #itstrategy #ceos
Zachman’s top two rows equate to MAGIC but the lower down you go the more IT specific it becomes.
https://pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?Showname=BOOKR-PF2&ComponentNo=000277
Here we map the Zachman Ontology to the structural Ontology
of POET:
¨
Rows 1 and 2 map to the top two levels of MAGIC (Contextual and Conceptual)
but not completely: ...to read more, please Login or Register |
Keypoint |
Adopt this component by... |
Zachman’s top two rows equate to MAGIC but the lower down you go the more IT specific it becomes.
|
Enterprise Architect: Be aware that Zachman’s rows, get more IT specific the further down you go.
|
Questions to ponder... |
Do you agree that Zachman gets more IT centric the further down you go? |
If not, why not? How would you map these things? |
