https://pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?Showname=TRAIN-1-Fundamentals&ComponentNo=000274
Do you agree that the Deployer Perspective is missing in Zachman?
If not, why not?
If not, how to you reconcile the mismatches?
https://pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?Showname=TRAIN-1-Fundamentals&ComponentNo=000274
FREE EA Training at www.PEAF.com/Training
FREE EA Books at www.PEAF.com/Books
#PEAF #PragmaticEA #EntArch #enterprisearchitecture #BizArch #Change #Innovation #BusinessModel #CEO #Strategy #TOGAF #ITgovernance #agileculture #agile #agileleadership #agilemethodology #itstrategy #ceos
In the Zachman Framework/Ontology, the Deployer perspective is missing.
https://pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?Showname=TRAIN-1-Fundamentals&ComponentNo=000274
Plate A
Here we see the Zachman Ontology, showing the two labels used
for each row. On the left is what is referred to as “Audience Perspectives” and
on the right is what Z is referred to as “Model Names” or “Representations”.
These “Perspectives” and “Model Names” form a stack from high level strategy at
the top to physical things in Operations at the bottom. The “Perspectives” on
the left relate to people and therefore the work those people do. The “Model
Names” on the right relate to the information those people use to do their
work. ...to read more, please Login or Register |
Keypoint |
Adopt this component by... |
In the Zachman Framework/Ontology, the Deployer perspective is missing.
|
Enterprise Architect: Be aware that the Deployer perspective is missing.
|
Questions to ponder... |
Do you agree that the Deployer Perspective is missing in Zachman? |
If not, why not? |
If not, how to you reconcile the mismatches? |
