Index

PF2

Frameworks

Comparisons

TOGAF and Zachman
Misunderstanding
Criteria
Raw Scores
Overall
Example Weightings 1
Example Weightings 2

TOGAF

Now What
Content vs Benefits
Overall
ADM
Other Frameworks
Other Detail
Guidance vs Detail
Trends

Zachman

Basic Message
Missing Perspective and Model
Overall
Architect Engineer
Why How
How When What Where Who
Perspectives and Models
       
Click a Thumbnail to read the component. Hold down Ctrl while clicking to expand the image

 

TOGAF - Comparing POET and PEAF to TOGAF and Zachman


PF2>Frameworks>Comparisons>TOGAF>Now-What ◄◄◄           .           ►►► PF2>Frameworks>Comparisons>TOGAF>Overall

Here we illustrate a simple comparison between TOGAF and PEAF.

PEAF was never designed to be 100% complete or all encompassing. PEAF was built by an Enterprise Architect, for Enterprise Architects (or people wishing to move into that role, or management wishing to understand EA) in real world scenarios, by observing and experiencing EA failure, and then creating a Pragmatic set of fundamentals things to prevent other Enterprises making those same fundamental mistakes.

 ...to read more, please Login or Register

PF2>Frameworks>Comparisons>TOGAF>Now-What ◄◄◄         Enroll to Self Study Now!         ►►► PF2>Frameworks>Comparisons>TOGAF>Overall

Keypoint

Adopt this component by...

PEAF provides the 20% (fundamentals) that yields 80% of the benefit. TOGAF provides the 80% (details), that yields 20% of the benefit.

EA Project Team: Utilise PEAF to put in place the 20% (fundamentals) that yields 80% of the benefit.

Questions to ponder...

Do you agree with this assertion?

If not, why not, and how would you draw the diagram?

© 2008-2021 Pragmatic 365 Ltd         A Non-Profit dedicated to improving Transformation, and the lives of people that work in Transformation.